I came back to this thread to ask the exact same question. I must be getting old!
The unpopular or otherwise, question thread.
- Thread starter Blobbenstein
- Start date
They also place their first name after the surname e.g. BROWN Susan instead of Susan Brown.
Val
Forum Legend
Hmmm, russians do it both ways. It depends on how much official the situation is...
Is it an acceptable reason for wanting to get a new job that I've been with the same company for more than a decade and it's awkward when someone with whom I had interactions at some point in time now runs into me and goes "hi I.S., how are you?" and I can't always immediately remember their names? 
Inconceivable!I would rather say it is more an illustration of the point you made 3 posts above
FredVegrox
Forum Legend
I agree about names being given in weird ways. I have my own question, why are we not using maternal lineage names? There is a whole side of all our relations that we are not connected by name with, for not wanting mothers to pass on a name of inheritance. I don't think that is justified, I did take on a maternal lineage name myself, based on a maternal ancestor, that is, going back through mothers, in this case five mothers ago.
Last edited:
@FredVegrox Lately I've been seriously thinking about changing my middle name to my mother's maiden surname. This could conceivably get complicated, depending on how far back I want to go-or even COULD go: Alex Haley did a great job of tracing his ancestry in "Roots", but eventually I'd get to a point where I couldn't go back any further. But since both my mother and maternal grandmother were okay with their last name, I'd be okay with using it.
