Militant veganism?

But why do adult humans, who aren’t supposed to drink milk, need milk alternatives anyway? I think that’s the point @Graeme M is trying to make.
Yes. I'm not criticising people drinking alt milks, nor finding fault with alt milks. I'm saying that vegans should not make the "milk is for babies" argument when clearly vegan adults drink it too. They aren't drinking soy milk because it's a pleasant white liquid, they are drinking it as a direct substitute for actual milk. Why do adults need milk alternatives? Because people, weaned or not, like the taste of milk. It's nothing to do with being a baby. Using the "milk is for babies" argument exposes vegans to ridicule and reputational damage because it's a dumb argument. It would only fly if vegans set the example and didn't drink alt milks.

Anyway, I will leave this one alone now. In my original comment I was pointing out that there are many dumb vegan memes and arguments which I wish vegans wouldn't use. They make us look foolish. There is one argument only for veganism - that animals should not be regarded as property and used unfairly, and we should try to do otherwise whenever we can.

So @Graeme M how Did you defend the cause?
I repeated my comment here earlier. Here it is again:

"Veganism objects to our unfair use of other animals, so the goal is not to use products from animals when we can do that. But that doesn't mean we don't like the taste of milk or using milk in various forms, so like in other contexts it's worth developing alternatives that don't require animal use. In fact finding/developing alternatives is a central plank in vegan principles. Luckily from a production/consumption point of view, all vegans are doing is transferring demand from one kind of producer to another."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom L.