das_nut
Forum Legend
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2012
- Reaction score
- 575
I could see giving the women (who are carrying their own babies) an extra 2 weeks before the baby is born, as that is a very exhausting time. But if all the leave time is after the birth, men should be allowed to spend equal time with their babies.
Agreed. While I can't criticize the extended family leave (it would be nice if everyone enjoyed that!), by implementing it unequally, it hurts women's value in the workplace.
IIRC, Sweden ran into an issue with this, due to generous family leave (which resulted in women's careers not being as successful), and they ended up mandating that each partner had to take a minimum of two months off for a new child.
This happened to my sister. When she was pregnant with her first child (my nephew), she had just been diagnosed with a uterine fibroid, a rather large one. So she had to have a C-section to deliver him. First they did a fibroidectomy, then they did a babyectomy. When it came time to deliver her daughter, she told me that she had to have another C-section, not because of any medical problems, but because the direction of the incision she had 3 years earlier could cause uterine rupture. Or something like that.
