- Joined
- Jul 11, 2012
- Reaction score
- 101
http://www.stoppopulationgrowthnow.com/
Are there any political parties in other countries similar to this one?
Are there any political parties in other countries similar to this one?
In the US, our population wouldn't be growing if it wasn't for immigration.
This tends to be true for most of the west - Europe (in general), US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, even westernized countries like Japan.
So what a ZPG party would look like in the US is a party that is (1) against immigration and (2) in favor of telling mostly poor, mostly non-white people in other countries not to breed.
I could see that party having some rather creepy undertones.
I don't consider it a race issue at all. Population growth can't go on forever. Should we just do nothing to solve this problem? If there was a party like that in the US, they'd get my vote.In the US, our population wouldn't be growing if it wasn't for immigration.
This tends to be true for most of the west - Europe (in general), US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, even westernized countries like Japan.
So what a ZPG party would look like in the US is a party that is (1) against immigration and (2) in favor of telling mostly poor, mostly non-white people in other countries not to breed.
I could see that party having some rather creepy undertones.
I'm pretty surprised we don't have one of those already...
If the solution is to stop immigration, that isn't quelling population growth, it is just keeping people in different areas of the earth.I don't consider it a race issue at all. Population growth can't go on forever. Should we just do nothing to solve this problem? If there was a party like that in the US, they'd get my vote.
Their heads would implode with the anti-abortion/birth control stance and the do not breed stance... oh wait, there is abstinence.
I don't consider it a race issue at all. Population growth can't go on forever. Should we just do nothing to solve this problem? If there was a party like that in the US, they'd get my vote.
If the solution is to stop immigration, that isn't quelling population growth, it is just keeping people in different areas of the earth.
Well, population growth isn't going to go on forever - it's slowing down, and will eventually peak, then should fall.
So even if we don't do anything, the problem will solve itself.
I'd rather see the population growth rate drop faster, but there's the carrot and the stick approach. The stick approach would be punishing women and the resulting children financially for large families. I'm not sure about you, but I'd rather not punish children.
The carrot approach would be better education and healthcare access for women. That has proven to be positively correlated with decreasing family size.
Ironically, encouraging immigration would reduce population growth rates, due to the increased standard of living. Discouraging immigration would increase population growth rates on a global level.
All of these.Immigration is always a race issue. Or a class issue, which is really no better, ethically.
As far as the United States goes, there's no reason to believe population growth will end anytime soon. Being the country that supplies a lot of food to the world, the downfall of the United States will have a very serious impact on the rest of the world. If we had tried keeping our population below 200,000,000(which means cutting immigration decades ago), that would be a good thing for the United States and the world. It's much easier to avoid a crisis at 200,000,000 compared to 300,000,000+.Well, population growth isn't going to go on forever - it's slowing down, and will eventually peak, then should fall.
So even if we don't do anything, the problem will solve itself.
I'd rather see the population growth rate drop faster, but there's the carrot and the stick approach. The stick approach would be punishing women and the resulting children financially for large families. I'm not sure about you, but I'd rather not punish children.
The carrot approach would be better education and healthcare access for women. That has proven to be positively correlated with decreasing family size.
Ironically, encouraging immigration would reduce population growth rates, due to the increased standard of living. Discouraging immigration would increase population growth rates on a global level.
Since this is about Australia, which groups are coming into Australia through immigration?
Since this is about Australia, which groups are coming into Australia through immigration?
As far as the United States goes, there's no reason to believe population growth will end anytime soon.
Being the country that supplies a lot of food to the world, the downfall of the United States will have a very serious impact on the rest of the world. If we had tried keeping our population below 200,000,000(which means cutting immigration decades ago), that would be a good thing for the United States and the world. It's much easier to avoid a crisis at 200,000,000 compared to 300,000,000+.
Which group of immigrants are you referring to that has a higher standard of living and has reduced their population growth?
Well the birth rate is below replacement levels. Do you want to stop or slow immigration? Or cut back on the use of resources?We're losing a lot of good farm land every year. This trend can't continue. Peak oil, peak water, and the extinction of virtually all fish(oceans create maybe 200 million jobs) are potential problems. Having farming reliant on fossil fuels is another one. There are many lesser-known resources that could be problems. Most problems basically go back to the same thing:there are far too many people in the world. This century will see many problems that could turn into a crisis very easily. Any claims that the average American would be using more resources with less people is just a guess without any evidence to back up.
If other countries had an obvious overpopulation problem, at least there's a chance their government may do something about it. As far as I'm aware of, the United States hasn't done anything. The Green Revolution may have caused an additional 1 billion people to be living on this planet. If anything, the United States has promoted the problem rather than addressing it.
In Mexico they're not having a lot of children these days. Do Mexicans who come to the United States have less children than Mexicans who stay in Mexico? I see no reason to believe that's the case. If it has helped, I don't think it's helped much.
There are around 320,000,000 people in the United States today. As far as we're aware of, there has never been a country with our population that uses up the amount of resources that Americans use. IT HAS NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE. Do you realize how risky this is?
they just want to win the culture wars and keep non-white, non-westerners from outbreeding whites. Gross.