Personally, when it comes to a "man's world" of business (however real or imagined it is), I'd like to see a reordering of priorities.
It seems clear, based on the statistics we have, men are still expected (either by themselves or by women) to be more likely to define themselves through their career. Men work more hours, work in riskier jobs (most on-the-job-deaths are male - odds are the riskier the field, the more heavily its male dominated), and are expected to spend less times with their families.
Wouldn't it be healthier for all if, instead of trying to forcing women into that same career-centric mold, we free men from it? This is one of the things the original linked article talks about (I know, how rude of me to actually get back on topic
). This is one of the things feminism has been traditionally bad at challenging - first wave was for de jure rights, second wave was for de facto rights, third wave actually figured out that there's more than just middle class white women, but all have been pretty focused at gaining equal footing, instead of examining what the hell they are trying to gain.
While there has been some movements towards reordering society, as a whole, the feminist movement is not so much of "smash the patriarchy" as it is "join the patriarchy" (to use the misleading term of "patriarchy").
I'd rather seek a massive reordering of priorities. Which is what the original link was talking about. And I understand that the earlier waves of feminism were important at gaining more equal rights, but time has marched on, and the best way to fix the system now is to replace it. Some people will still be career-driven, but lets not trap people into roles based on their gender, regardless of what that gender may be.
