Maybe she meant he's not hurting the swamp monsters that he promised he'd evict?
I was lolling at this: "To them, it does not make a difference if he’s a vagina-grabber, or if his campaign team colluded with Russia to help him defeat his political opponent".
Thanks for posting it.
I was lolling about the discrepancies in this idiotic sentence, especially, putting in one row such categories as grabbing pussies and alleged collusion with Rissia. Moreover, Putin is not a moron to help such a person as Trump to win, because (i don't want to criticize your goverment), it was obvious (long before Trump's elections) that Russian-American relationships would fall sub-basement despite of any outcome of the elections. OTOH, Hillary clamed that she hates Russia with all her heart, so she probably was not an option for Moscow as well. There was no lucky way out of this situation for Russia, so it's "highly likely", that Russia didn't intervene at all.
Lol, i remembered how, after my complaints, my big boss advised me to switch on my dictophone and record kompromat on my shitty boss.
...I think that russian intellegence could get "komprometiruyuschiye materialy" on everybody. And i'm sure that Hillary is not a "god's dandelion" either, and that she has plenty of "dirty laundry" to hide from her electorate. So, following this logic, even if "the long arm of Moscow" couldn't have reached the election results in the meantime, evil russians could have made Hillary behave later, when she wins. But i have a question: is Hillary any better than Trump on the international arena? Speaking of her: claiming that Russia is an enemy and providing sanctions and other "instruments of political pressure" against the biggest country in the world (which, in addition, owns nuclear weapon) is not a very smart thing to do for a candidate, and it doesn't help with trust and loyalty of electorate.
