Veganism, utilitarianism, edge-cases

g0rph

Forum Legend
Joined
Aug 18, 2022
Reaction score
366
Location
Sweden
Lifestyle
  1. Other
I've been doing a lot of thinking recently. Being 100% vegan surrounded by non-vegans is challenging.

I stopped eating meat and buying leather, wool etc for ethical reasons. We don't "need" to kill animals for food and clothes, so doing so is morally negative.

But many vegans on forums are so extreme that even picking up feathers in the forest is deemed non-vegan.
This is insanity.

I have removed "vegan" from my profile, to "other".

Some reasons...
1. 90% + of the bread here in Sweden is vegan-friendly. But if I buy the wrong pack for lunch, make a sandwich and then realise it has traces of milk in that particular bake...I am going to eat it anyway (and make a note of the brand to avoid in the future). Many people suggest passing it on, but that has no positive or negative utilitarian outcome. i.e. It makes no difference. Not eating it (unless allergies) doesn't change a damn thing.

2. A video by one of my favourite Youtubers (Rationality Rules) got me thinking about why some of us went vegan and why others find it more difficult. And he mentions "The circle of altruism". And it makes a lot of sense.
For example, I went totally animal product free a year ago. And have remained that way during this time. But honestly, I feel very little to the plight of insects compared to the plight of pigs. And that feels normal. Sure, I save bees from our pool, and catch and release when possible, but then I also put ant-poison down under the decking and have had to get the exterminators in for a wasps nest. Do I feel guilty or sad about that? Quite frankly, not really.

3. I've been getting sore joints recently. It could be age and it could be something lacking. I don't know. But I do take a multivitamin, then the occaisional B-Complex, Iron and D. As well as Omega 3 from algae. But I decided I am going to start eating mussels. (Oysters maybe too, but they are rare here). They lack a central nervous system and a brain. I have seen conflicting views on this, but rolling back around to the circle of altruism and honestly, I only stopped eating them as a way of logically completing "the rules of veganism" rather than any empathy toward what is essentially a non-sentient lump of gristle.
Not to mention that farmed mussels and oysters have a far smaller effect on other (actually sentient) creatures than, for example, growing wheat does.
My personal moral compass wants to reduce suffering. Following strict guidelines written by others is not following my own moral compass. Ultimately, morality is subjective. There are no absolutes.

4. And lastly, but maybe most "un-vegan", I am not against all exploitation. I agree with responsible breeding. Non-human animals have got humanity to where we are today, and without them we almost certainly wouldn't have flourished as we have. From dogs protecting us from predators to horses providing transport and oxen helping plow our fields.
Also, I strongly believe that without the proximity to animals that we have in daily life, veganism would not have come about. They give us an insight into their intelligence, character and for want of a better word, their soul.
Of course this shouldn't be as it is today with puppy mills and terrible conditions. But if a loving family wants another member, then why not. I don't regard our pooch to be "exploited", at least not in any bad way.
And service dogs, for the disabled, sniffer dogs, police dogs and horses...all have a place in our world...for now. Technology could change that, but right now there is no replacement for a sniffer dog at the airport, or a K9 unit or a seeing-eye dog for a blind person. The idea of banning that is, itself unethical IMO.
Obviously this leads to another problem...what to feed them, but there are already options available, and with time, meat not sourced from living animals will be the norm.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Brian W and KLS52
Hi I hope you’re okay.
Just on the subject of
(3) keeping joints strong, fit and healthy I take vegan collagen tablets.
I got some from a company called Vegan Vitality
 
  • Informative
Reactions: g0rph
Hi I hope you’re okay.
Just on the subject of
(3) keeping joints strong, fit and healthy I take vegan collagen tablets.
I got some from a company called Vegan Vitality
Hi, thanks. Yes, I'm fine thanks.
It looks like vegan collagen tablets are not actually collagen tablets, but nutrients that can boost your own collagen levels?
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Blues
Hi, thanks. Yes, I'm fine thanks.
It looks like vegan collagen tablets are not actually collagen tablets, but nutrients that can boost your own collagen
Hi, thanks. Yes, I'm fine thanks.
It looks like vegan collagen tablets are not actually collagen tablets, but nutrients that can boost your own collagen levels?
I guess it is nutrients I attached the list of ingredients, I also believe walnuts help
5B4B3011-B0D3-4F42-821A-F4B2E99333B0.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: g0rph
Being 100% vegan surrounded by non-vegans is challenging.
I know what you mean, because the rest of the world will never be 100% vegan so it can seem a challenge to live the philosophy and yet see everyone else doing differently, which also makes your own path more difficult. To be honest, I think being a strict vegan is unnecessary unless it is something you feel so strongly about that it is what you want to do.

My own position is that first, there is nothing intrinsically wrong with using and eating other animals when we must. Veganism for me is really about treating other animals fairly whenever we can, and whenever we can is up to each of us. And second, what we actually do makes very little difference to anything, while genuine vegans are a spectacularly small proportion of the community. Really, we are doing what we believe aligns us best with our own moral values.

That isn't to say that I don't think that every little bit doesn't help, but rather that every little bit all of the time isn't particularly important. For now, the larger picture depends on what we do as an average. On average, are we contributing to less demand for products from animal-using industries? If so, then we are on the right track.

So, buy a non vegan-friendly product by mistake? Eat it/wear it/use it, unless you think it is better to pass it on. The damage as such has already been done. Insects are important and helping them out as individuals when you can is a decent thing to do. But kill them to protect your food? Perfectly fine. Oysters and mussels? If you eat plants then you can eat oysters and mussels. Oysters do not spend any time thinking about anything. And generally speaking there are far more important things to worry about than the fact we use animals for companionship, work and play. Within reason, because we should still seek to prevent their harm and suffering when we can.

Boiled down, I think about veganism as a justice movement. I'm pretty agnostic about what people actually do, other than to encourage them to learn what they can about treating other animals fairly. As I have said before, I'd rather 30% of the population do something than 3% of the population do everything.
 
I am enjoying this thread and the replies; but I would add that I consider kindness to be a greater virtue than justice. Justice can too easily be rationalized into violence or even war for defense or retribution. Kindness is always the right choice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KLS52 and Emma JC
I am enjoying this thread and the replies; but I would add that I consider kindness to be a greater virtue than justice. Justice can too easily be rationalized into violence or even war for defense or retribution. Kindness is always the right choice.
I'm not sure about your suggestion that justice can be bent to nefarious purposes. I suppose you mean that we can believe that revenge or retribution for some wrong deed is seen as a just outcome, but when we think of justice as being essentially about fairness, I think we can argue cogently in favour of justice as a sound basis for so much of our moral beliefs about relations with others. Isn't fairness at the base of almost every moral case for treating others well? Is revenge fair?

Kindness on the other hand should naturally emerge from any attempt to be fair to others, but of itself doesn't seem to have quite the same moral imperative. Consider animal farming. What is "kind" in the ways we treat farmed animals? Plenty of people seem to be able to believe that it is important to be kind to the animals we farm, but they are still comfortable with those animals being killed. If it IS kind to treat animals well yet still kill them, there doesn't seem to be any limit on just how many animals we can treat this way. On the other hand, is it fair to breed animals just to be killed for food, especially when so much food is wasted or is produced for trivial reasons (eg fast foods, birthday parties, family BBQs)? We can happily continue to produce food for such uses so long as we are "kind", but I think there might be a stronger case to make that it is unfair to do so.
 
I'm not sure about your suggestion that justice can be bent to nefarious purposes. I suppose you mean that we can believe that revenge or retribution for some wrong deed is seen as a just outcome, but when we think of justice as being essentially about fairness, I think we can argue cogently in favour of justice as a sound basis for so much of our moral beliefs about relations with others.
It all depends on one's idea of justice. It's a far too subjective term.
"Justice" for some women committing adultery in certain parts of the world is stoning to death.
Adultery isn't even a crime in others. (As it ought not be IMO).
"Justice" for a 18 yo sleeping with a 16yr old in certain parts of the USA is a statutory rape charge. In the UK it is perfectly legal (As it ought to be IMO).
"Justice" for a woman in Texas seeking an abortion...
etc etc.

Isn't fairness at the base of almost every moral case for treating others well? Is revenge fair?
Revenge is almost always morally wrong. Why laws should never be made by people affected by the crime.
Kindness on the other hand should naturally emerge from any attempt to be fair to others, but of itself doesn't seem to have quite the same moral imperative.
Kindness is harder. It requires thought.
Consider animal farming. What is "kind" in the ways we treat farmed animals? Plenty of people seem to be able to believe that it is important to be kind to the animals we farm, but they are still comfortable with those animals being killed. If it IS kind to treat animals well yet still kill them, there doesn't seem to be any limit on just how many animals we can treat this way.
Of course it isn't kind. I do prefer farms where animals are treated well until death, but the farmers their are still acting in a morally bad way.
On the other hand, is it fair to breed animals just to be killed for food, especially when so much food is wasted or is produced for trivial reasons (eg fast foods, birthday parties, family BBQs)? We can happily continue to produce food for such uses so long as we are "kind", but I think there might be a stronger case to make that it is unfair to do so.
Not to mention that if we stopped breeding animals to eat, we would need to grow LESS crops than we do now, not more.
 
I've been doing a lot of thinking recently. Being 100% vegan surrounded by non-vegans is challenging.

I stopped eating meat and buying leather, wool etc for ethical reasons. We don't "need" to kill animals for food and clothes, so doing so is morally negative.

But many vegans on forums are so extreme that even picking up feathers in the forest is deemed non-vegan.
This is insanity.

I have removed "vegan" from my profile, to "other".

Some reasons...
1. 90% + of the bread here in Sweden is vegan-friendly. But if I buy the wrong pack for lunch, make a sandwich and then realise it has traces of milk in that particular bake...I am going to eat it anyway (and make a note of the brand to avoid in the future). Many people suggest passing it on, but that has no positive or negative utilitarian outcome. i.e. It makes no difference. Not eating it (unless allergies) doesn't change a damn thing.

2. A video by one of my favourite Youtubers (Rationality Rules) got me thinking about why some of us went vegan and why others find it more difficult. And he mentions "The circle of altruism". And it makes a lot of sense.
For example, I went totally animal product free a year ago. And have remained that way during this time. But honestly, I feel very little to the plight of insects compared to the plight of pigs. And that feels normal. Sure, I save bees from our pool, and catch and release when possible, but then I also put ant-poison down under the decking and have had to get the exterminators in for a wasps nest. Do I feel guilty or sad about that? Quite frankly, not really.

3. I've been getting sore joints recently. It could be age and it could be something lacking. I don't know. But I do take a multivitamin, then the occaisional B-Complex, Iron and D. As well as Omega 3 from algae. But I decided I am going to start eating mussels. (Oysters maybe too, but they are rare here). They lack a central nervous system and a brain. I have seen conflicting views on this, but rolling back around to the circle of altruism and honestly, I only stopped eating them as a way of logically completing "the rules of veganism" rather than any empathy toward what is essentially a non-sentient lump of gristle.
Not to mention that farmed mussels and oysters have a far smaller effect on other (actually sentient) creatures than, for example, growing wheat does.
My personal moral compass wants to reduce suffering. Following strict guidelines written by others is not following my own moral compass. Ultimately, morality is subjective. There are no absolutes.

4. And lastly, but maybe most "un-vegan", I am not against all exploitation. I agree with responsible breeding. Non-human animals have got humanity to where we are today, and without them we almost certainly wouldn't have flourished as we have. From dogs protecting us from predators to horses providing transport and oxen helping plow our fields.
Also, I strongly believe that without the proximity to animals that we have in daily life, veganism would not have come about. They give us an insight into their intelligence, character and for want of a better word, their soul.
Of course this shouldn't be as it is today with puppy mills and terrible conditions. But if a loving family wants another member, then why not. I don't regard our pooch to be "exploited", at least not in any bad way.
And service dogs, for the disabled, sniffer dogs, police dogs and horses...all have a place in our world...for now. Technology could change that, but right now there is no replacement for a sniffer dog at the airport, or a K9 unit or a seeing-eye dog for a blind person. The idea of banning that is, itself unethical IMO.
Obviously this leads to another problem...what to feed them, but there are already options available, and with time, meat not sourced from living animals will be the norm.
Hello.
I went in a Subway take away the other day and asked for a vegan filling but could see i had not asked for the vegan bread roll.
Also i like rescuing spiders that have come indoors and also like guiding flies out of the window but can not say i have never squashed a creepy crawly in a piece of tissue and thrown it out of the window.
 
Hello.
I went in a Subway take away the other day and asked for a vegan filling but could see i had not asked for the vegan bread roll.
Also i like rescuing spiders that have come indoors and also like guiding flies out of the window but can not say i have never squashed a creepy crawly in a piece of tissue and thrown it out of the window.
I used to do that, but quite recently I had a bit of an epiphany.
I was out in the garden, relaxing on a deckchair, and a tiny fruit fly landed on my jumper. I watched him? for a while and then he took off and flew away.
Nothing world-changing no, but in that moment, I could sense another "being" just going about his? life. The idea of squashing him was kind of revolting.

btw, I'm the same age :) Born March 1967 :) (From up north, now emigrated)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brian W
1. 90% + of the bread here in Sweden is vegan-friendly. But if I buy the wrong pack for lunch, make a sandwich and then realise it has traces of milk in that particular bake...I am going to eat it anyway (and make a note of the brand to avoid in the future). Many people suggest passing it on, but that has no positive or negative utilitarian outcome. i.e. It makes no difference. Not eating it (unless allergies) doesn't change a damn thing.
As a utilitarian, I agree that these actions by themselves don't have negative outcome but I still would not choose to do them as I feel revolted by eating animal products, even if the demand has already been made.

However, I think the everybody who agrees with animal rights being a vegan and following the rules decently strictly could help the movement in two ways.
The first one is making the idea of animal liberation simpler. If everyone is surrounded by people who call themselves vegan, they would have a much larger chance of understanding what the movement, and becoming vegan themselves, is about than people who give a long explanation of them being partly vegan. It's a lot easier understanding not eating or using animal products than sometimes eating or using animal products.
The second one is that if people slightly bend the rules of veganism, some people might assume that they can bend the rules for something a lot more extreme. This applies less to you but an example is if a "vegan" eats eggs from chickens who are treated really well, don't eat them when they're fed back to them and don't get killed when they don't make eggs, etc. , other vegans or questioning vegans may think eating eggs from "ethical" farms is okay and start eating eggs from chickens that are treated well but are killed when they're not profitable or the farmer doesn't attempt to feed the eggs back to them.

What I mean is being vegan is not just the actions that you do yourself - it's also doing what may influence others the most and being a vegan would be a lot better for the movement than sometimes being vegan and bending the rules in edge cases like yours. However, I don't think this means we should be perfect all the time - I think it's still okay to do things like stepping on insects accidentally and using soap in public bathrooms when you don't have hand sanitizer on you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Col
Regarding eating something bought accidentally that made from animals or their fluids with regard to utilitarianism. Utilitarianism defined as is doing the greatest good for the greatest number.

1- As Matteo said it can indeed look to others as if the act of killing, buying and eating products of animals less wrong and encourage perpetuation of suffering. It could also in theory be viewed by someone of a species who had a superior sense of smell and had an emotional understanding.
2. Ingestion of the toxins will likely do more harm than good for the eater. The energy gained from the food would be the result of suffering and may make the person disconnect and cause more suffering.
3. The act of returning it to the shop may add a little bit to the likelihood the shop will sell more plant based bread or at least label it more clearly, and other customers may feel able not to be embarrassed doing so, and the producer may make less profit from killing and cause less killing as a result.
4. A culture where deceased remains are consumed is not a culture where life is respected, and a respectful culture would be beneficial to a greater number.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matteo
As a utilitarian, I agree that these actions by themselves don't have negative outcome but I still would not choose to do them as I feel revolted by eating animal products, even if the demand has already been made.

However, I think the everybody who agrees with animal rights being a vegan and following the rules decently strictly could help the movement in two ways.
The first one is making the idea of animal liberation simpler. If everyone is surrounded by people who call themselves vegan, they would have a much larger chance of understanding what the movement, and becoming vegan themselves, is about than people who give a long explanation of them being partly vegan. It's a lot easier understanding not eating or using animal products than sometimes eating or using animal products.
The second one is that if people slightly bend the rules of veganism, some people might assume that they can bend the rules for something a lot more extreme. This applies less to you but an example is if a "vegan" eats eggs from chickens who are treated really well, don't eat them when they're fed back to them and don't get killed when they don't make eggs, etc. , other vegans or questioning vegans may think eating eggs from "ethical" farms is okay and start eating eggs from chickens that are treated well but are killed when they're not profitable or the farmer doesn't attempt to feed the eggs back to them.

What I mean is being vegan is not just the actions that you do yourself - it's also doing what may influence others the most and being a vegan would be a lot better for the movement than sometimes being vegan and bending the rules in edge cases like yours. However, I don't think this means we should be perfect all the time - I think it's still okay to do things like stepping on insects accidentally and using soap in public bathrooms when you don't have hand sanitizer on you.
Accidentally doing anything is okay...if it is truly accidental and you weren't taking unnecessary risks.

Using soap in public bathrooms. Of course it's okay. I don't even think about it, nor particularly want to. Nor about the toilet paper, much of which is not vegan.

I don't even use the "vegan" tag here now anyway, as there are a number of things that I do and that I believe that many hard-core vegans would be against...

eg.
If I am out on a business meal, sure I always order vegan, and make do if there are few options... but I rarely worry about the alcohol (which is always served).
I will put poison traps down for the ants that are close to the house.
We called the exterminators on a wasp infestation in the house.

I am not against sensible dog breeding, or their use as companions, service dogs or even police and army...
I think police horses are fine.

I would and have eaten mussels since giving up animal products in my diet. There is no evidence that they have any equivalent to thoughts, or pain.

And I see Lewis Hamilton was vilified recently because he sat on a camel. FFS that guy has done more for the cause than everyone on this forum put together. He didn't harm the animal; it was used to bearing people and his actions were culturally appropriate. Had he refused it wouldn't have helped a damn thing and possibly been counter-productive.
Same with Joaquin Phoenix and horses.

It's like someone will be eating bacon , eggs, steak one week, then a month later after going vegan, reading some shite on reddit, they rage at Gaz Oakley because he rescued some chickens, uses their poo as fertilizer and gives the spare eggs to people who eat them.

Life isn't "all or nothing". There is or at least ought to be nuance.
"Exploiting" animals is not inherently wrong if no harm is being done and intentions are good....i.e. Companion animals and guide dogs for blind people.
I "exploit" my partner for car rides on nights out when I might have had a couple of beers and she hasn't.

In the end, I don't eat meat, dairy, eggs. I don't buy leather, silk, wool. I check labels. I buy vegan hand soap and shower cream etc. I take insects outside where possible. But I also live in a non-vegan world and have to work AND not appear to be mentally ill in front of customers!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: silva
Accidentally doing anything is okay...if it is truly accidental and you weren't taking unnecessary risks.
Yes, I don't think you should be to blame if something is accidental but what I'm saying the issue is is you consuming it and not returning because of the reasons I said before and the ones that @Col mentioned.
It's like someone will be eating bacon , eggs, steak one week, then a month later after going vegan, reading some shite on reddit, they rage at Gaz Oakley because he rescued some chickens, uses their poo as fertilizer and gives the spare eggs to people who eat them.
I explained what's wrong with this, even though the act itself is okay, it normalizes eating eggs and makes the message harder to understand.
Life isn't "all or nothing". There is or at least ought to be nuance.
I agree, vegans can't be perfect, but that doesn't justify doing things that aren't very hard (such as asking for water instead of alcohol when you're served in a business meal).
In the end, I don't eat meat, dairy, eggs. I don't buy leather, silk, wool. I check labels. I buy vegan hand soap and shower cream etc. I take insects outside where possible. But I also live in a non-vegan world and have to work AND not appear to be mentally ill in front of customers!
What does having to work have to do with eating animal products and how would asking for water instead of alcohol make you seem mentally ill? I don't understand.

If you're utilitarian, some of the things that you're doing have negative utility - asking for another type of drink isn't very hard and the amount it may help the movement and influence other people to go vegan is surely more than the inconvenience and possible judgement.
 
Regarding hiring an exterminator for a wasp infestation, couldn't there be better ways to deal with that? Wouldn't there be someone you could hire who could remove it and move it outside?
 
Yes, I don't think you should be to blame if something is accidental but what I'm saying the issue is is you consuming it and not returning because of the reasons I said before and the ones that @Col mentioned.

I explained what's wrong with this, even though the act itself is okay, it normalizes eating eggs and makes the message harder to understand.

I agree, vegans can't be perfect, but that doesn't justify doing things that aren't very hard (such as asking for water instead of alcohol when you're served in a business meal).

What does having to work have to do with eating animal products and how would asking for water instead of alcohol make you seem mentally ill? I don't understand.

If you're utilitarian, some of the things that you're doing have negative utility - asking for another type of drink isn't very hard and the amount it may help the movement and influence other people to go vegan is surely more than the inconvenience and possible judgement.
Possibly.
But honestly, like I said...nuance and trying to be sensible about my stance. Especially seeing as I am the only "vegan" I know.
I don't worry about every bottle of wine or beer because quite honestly, life is too short. I buy vegan wine for myself at home, and think the beer I buy is vegan, but in the end, it's a minor issue. And AFAIK no beer states "vegan" on the label, and not all wines that are vegan do.
I am contributing more to animal suffering buying almonds than I am to having a glass of wine that *might* have used a non-vegan filtering agent.

And if I am out on business, I will be joining in. Sure, I eat the plant-based meal, but these things are usually drink-centric. I'll stick to the wine and beer and simply not worry about if some fining agent back in the filtering stage wasn't vegan, because the alternative is to get into a discussion about "why the **** are you drinking water?"

Oh and the "consuming" the non-vegan bread. I don't any more. Although I don't think it's not vegan to do so in that circumstance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Col
Regarding hiring an exterminator for a wasp infestation, couldn't there be better ways to deal with that? Wouldn't there be someone you could hire who could remove it and move it outside?
There is literally one firm here that does removal of wasps..(was inside the wall cavity). They ain't gonna start farting around trying to save them...
 
  • Agree
Reactions: silva