Lou
Forum Legend
Well, it's a slippery slope.
I think I recall you are reluctant to call yourself vegan because of your Vitamin D supplement.
I kind of think that is sort of sad. You are certainly vegan. How is being 98% vegan - not vegan enough.
I think people should be considered and consider themselves vegan if they are 98% vegan. But what about 97% or then if 97% is ok, what about 94%. *
I too call myself mostly vegan. About two years ago I made the decision not to worry about the details. The details were driving me crazy.
There is some areas that can drive any informed vegan a little nuts. The cultivation of Almonds and avocados harm bees. Palm oil cultivation harms orangutans. Non organic produce is bad for almost all living things.
This is where I fall back to the individuals intent and the vegan's society clause on "practical and possible". And since I'm not sure I meet the practical and possible requirement all the time then there is the mostly adjective to bail me out.
But you know, now that I am thinking about it. maybe that is not fair either. is vegan a binary state. like can you be mostly pregnant? Well... you can be almost dead.
Then again, I'm pretty sure it impossible to be IRL 100% vegan except in your intent. So full circle: its all about intent.
*How would you even calculate that. Dollars spent? calories consumed? Items in your frig?
I think I recall you are reluctant to call yourself vegan because of your Vitamin D supplement.
I kind of think that is sort of sad. You are certainly vegan. How is being 98% vegan - not vegan enough.
I think people should be considered and consider themselves vegan if they are 98% vegan. But what about 97% or then if 97% is ok, what about 94%. *
I too call myself mostly vegan. About two years ago I made the decision not to worry about the details. The details were driving me crazy.
There is some areas that can drive any informed vegan a little nuts. The cultivation of Almonds and avocados harm bees. Palm oil cultivation harms orangutans. Non organic produce is bad for almost all living things.
This is where I fall back to the individuals intent and the vegan's society clause on "practical and possible". And since I'm not sure I meet the practical and possible requirement all the time then there is the mostly adjective to bail me out.
But you know, now that I am thinking about it. maybe that is not fair either. is vegan a binary state. like can you be mostly pregnant? Well... you can be almost dead.
Then again, I'm pretty sure it impossible to be IRL 100% vegan except in your intent. So full circle: its all about intent.
*How would you even calculate that. Dollars spent? calories consumed? Items in your frig?
They may be eating plant based most of the year, but they are in no way vegan.