Maybe now they can show pictures or something. No jury in their right mind would believe the government's claims based on the "evidence" shown thus far.
Since no conviction is necessary, there is no reason to provide such evidence. They never should have even mentioned the involvement of seal team 6, and the guy claiming responsibility is in violation of his non disclosure agreement.
Since no conviction is necessary, there is no reason to provide such evidence. They never should have even mentioned the involvement of seal team 6, and the guy claiming responsibility is in violation of his non disclosure agreement.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.