We might think 'fake news' is a new phenomenon, but that is far from the truth. I've been enjoying CaspianReport's videos about fake news:
(A third video in the series is in the works, it sounds like.)
As mentioned in the second video, fake news was crucial to justify the invasion of Iraq and the overthrow of Saddam Hussein.
Indeed, also in the first Gulf War (1990-91), when Iraq had invaded Kuwait, fake news was crucial to justify US intervention:
As mentioned in the second video, fake news was crucial to justify the invasion of Iraq and the overthrow of Saddam Hussein.
Indeed, also in the first Gulf War (1990-91), when Iraq had invaded Kuwait, fake news was crucial to justify US intervention:
Source: Gulf War - Wikipedia (section titled 'Justification for intervention').Although there were human rights abuses committed in Kuwait by the invading Iraqi military, the alleged incidents which received most publicity in the US were inventions of the public relations firm hired by the government of Kuwait to influence US opinion in favor of military intervention. Shortly after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, the organization Citizens for a Free Kuwait was formed in the US. It hired the public relations firm Hill & Knowlton for about $11 million, paid by Kuwait's government.[106]
Among many other means of influencing US opinion, such as distributing books on Iraqi atrocities to US soldiers deployed in the region, "Free Kuwait" T-shirts and speakers to college campuses, and dozens of video news releases to television stations, the firm arranged for an appearance before a group of members of the US Congress in which a woman identifying herself as a nurse working in the Kuwait City hospital described Iraqi soldiers pulling babies out of incubators and letting them die on the floor.[107]
The story was an influence in tipping both the public and Congress towards a war with Iraq: six Congressmen said the testimony was enough for them to support military action against Iraq and seven Senators referenced the testimony in debate. The Senate supported the military actions in a 52–47 vote. However, a year after the war, this allegation was revealed to be a fabrication. The woman who had testified was found to be a member of Kuwait's Royal Family, in fact the daughter of Kuwait's ambassador to the US.[107] She hadn't lived in Kuwait during the Iraqi invasion.